Current:Home > MyIndia’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status -ThriveEdge Finance
India’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:40:51
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — India’s top court on Monday upheld a 2019 decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to strip disputed Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as a semi-autonomous region with a separate constitution and inherited protections on land and jobs.
The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the region’s special status had been a “temporary provision” and that removing it in 2019 was constitutionally valid.
The unprecedented move also divided the region into two federal territories, Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, both ruled directly by the central government without a legislature of their own. As a result, the Muslim-majority region is now run by unelected government officials and has lost its flag, criminal code and constitution.
But Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said the government has promised to restore Jammu-Kashmir’s statehood and should do so as soon as possible. Ladakh, however, will remain a federal territory.
He also ordered the country’s election commission to hold local legislative polls in the region by next Sept. 30.
The ruling is expected to boost the electoral prospects of Modi’s governing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in national polls next year. The 2019 move resonated in much of India, where the Modi government was cheered by supporters for fulfilling a long-held Hindu nationalist pledge to scrap the Muslim-majority region’s special status.
But the judgment will disappoint many in Kashmir, including the region’s main pro-India Kashmiri politicians who had petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse the deeply unpopular decision, which was imposed under an unprecedented security and communication clampdown that lasted many months.
The court’s hearings began in August and included extensive arguments and discussions on the move’s constitutional validity.
veryGood! (5126)
Related
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Prosecutors and victim’s family call for the release of a Minnesota man convicted of murder in 2009
- Inside Octomom Nadya Suleman's Family World as a Mom of 14 Kids
- Doja Cat Shuts Down Joseph Quinn Engagement Rumors With One Simple Message
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Gunman in Colorado supermarket shooting is the latest to fail with insanity defense
- California sues ExxonMobil and says it lied about plastics recycling
- Violent crime dropped for third straight year in 2023, including murder and rape
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- When does 'The Masked Singer' Season 12 start? Premiere date, time, where to watch and stream
Ranking
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Michigan repeat? Notre Dame in playoff? Five overreactions from Week 4 in college football
- 'Very precious:' Baby boy killed by Texas death row inmate Travis James Mullis was loved
- Nurse labor dispute at Hawaii hospital escalates with 10 arrests
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Michigan repeat? Notre Dame in playoff? Five overreactions from Week 4 in college football
- Exclusive: Watch 'The Summit' learn they have 14 days to climb mountain for $1 million
- Dancing With the Stars' Sasha Farber Raises Eyebrows With Flirty Comment to Jenn Tran
Recommendation
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
Heavy rains pelt the Cayman Islands as southeast US prepares for a major hurricane
Former NL batting champion Charlie Blackmon retiring after 14 seasons with Rockies
Police: Father arrested in shooting at Kansas elementary school after child drop off
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Halsey Shares Insight Into New Chapter With Fiancé Avan Jogia
Coach accused of offering $5,000 to buy children from parents, refusing to return kids
Emory Callahan Introduction